THE TALES OF Cs

Story telling is an art which has long evolved since the ancient days. Well, no wonder that epics like Homer’s Iliad, Sage Ved Vyasa’s Mahabharata, and Sage Valmiki’s Ramayana among others find an unparalleled readership. Agreed that these have been extolled to be nearly divine; yet, credit must be given to these authors / poets for composing these epics in the most interesting and even exciting fashion.

But what is it that makes these tales virtually everlasting? What is it, apart from their holiness, which makes them a favourite among all the generations? The prime reason, I believe, behind this is the fact that they are ‘Open to Interpretation(s)’. But what is it that renders them so? Among many attributes, I feel, there are a couple of reasons which work wonders even to this. Not only today, they will be regarded the ultimate recipe to make tales interesting for a long time to come. They are Controversy and Conspiracy. Expected something better, didn't you? But mind you, they have great power – For they can turn a smooth running story upside down! And this is what precisely makes these tales very catchy; and the mythological stories are quite full of those.

So, let us embark on a journey to know about a few such incidents which, according to me, give a new face to the tales we thought we knew so much about. But mind you, no absolute conclusions here; that would be totally left to your taste and perception.

SURPANAKHA
As we’d discussed previously, Surpanakha was a sister of Ravana; the youngest one, in fact. She was at birth christened Meenakshi (whether she had fish like big beautiful eyes is debatable); only to be later titled as Surpanakha, owing to her very sharp nails.
We know of her as one attracted to Lord Rama who attempted to hurt Sita to win over the Lord. Lakshman’s act of punishing her and her eventual provocation of Ravana to abduct Sita and teach Rama a lesson is common knowledge. But as is usually the case, is there more than what meets the eye? Let us attempt to know more about Surpanakha and see whether we can associate any of our 2 Cs with her tale.

Valmiki describes Surpanakha, during the time when she encounters Lord Rama, as a pot bellied and cross eyed Ugly woman with thinning hair and a voice too harsh for the ears. Certain versions, mainly Kamban’s, however describe her as a very beautiful woman with long, beautiful, fish-shaped eyes (validating her birth-name ‘Meenakshi’), a slender shape and a bewitching personality who possessed magical powers. Surpanakha was married to Dushtabuddhi, an Asura. It is said that initially this couple enjoyed high favor with Ravana and were privileged members of his court. But owing to a fall out, due to Dushtabuddhi’s scheming nature, Ravana had him killed, which was a matter of great displeasure to Surpanakha. It is this that instigated Surpanakha to hatch a plan to take revenge upon her Brother. Yes, there is a Conspiracy theory associated with Surpanakha’s true motive in provoking her brother to abduct Sita and wage a war against Lord Rama, who she knew was none other than Lord Vishnu incarnate.

Surpanakha was seeking an opportunity to be the cause of Ravana’s end, when one day she heard of a Prince who had killed both her Grandmother Tataka and Uncle Subahu in the Dandaka forest. After her observations, she was convinced that Lord Rama was more than a match for her brother and was actually Lord Vishnu incarnate. She conspired to pit Ravana against Lord Rama by latching onto Ravana’s weakest point – Women. Surpanakha was confident that her attack on Sita would bring the Princes upon her, thus creating a valid reason for her request to Ravana to take revenge by humiliating Rama by abducting his wife. She knew that Ravana would never let go this opportunity to win the hand, though by force and trickery, of the most beautiful woman (As some sources say, he already had attempted to win her hand in the Swayamvara but was unable to lift the Rudra Bow). The rest of course is common knowledge.

Apart from this theory, there is a controversy over Surpanakha’s treatment by the princes, which is more commonly debated. Why, for instance, did Lakshmana have to teach her a lesson by cutting her nose (Some versions also add the tip of her ear and breast to this)? Why, did Rama ask her to instead propose Lakshmana, whom he knew was also married? Was Surpanakha shunned by the brothers only because she was a Rakshasi and not good looking? The answers to the above range from the obvious to the outrageous. Some of them are:
1. Lord Rama had no mal-intent in asking her to propose to Lakshmana, as he genuinely thought that Lakshmana could have done with a companion during his forest life (Urmila was in a trance at Home).
2. Rama and Lakshmana had seen through her disguise and wanted to play a while. But as the situation got out of hand, Lakshmana was compelled to act out of desperation (Killing her may not have been an option, as she was a woman. This may, however, be countered by the example of Tataka’s killing.).
3. Surpanakha genuinely loved Lord Rama. But she was afraid of approaching him as she was quite older than him and also far less beautiful. So, she changed her form and very politely asked if she could give him some company as he seemed lost and in need of some rest. Rama and Lakshmana, knowing who she really was and seeking entertainment, toyed with her and punished her for her boldness (Sita is conspicuous by her absence).
We may stick to one and rubbish the other; but each view should be acknowledged for it shows each character in different lights.
SHAKUNI

Shakuni, the prince of the Gandhara kingdom, is characteristically famous for his reference in B.R Chopra’s Mahabharata as ‘Mamashri’. Like Surpanakha, he played the crucial role of instigating the chief antagonist of the epic. Shakuni was Duryodhana’s chief confidant and is known for his intelligent yet devious ways. However, unlike Surpanakha, he doesn’t fall in the background after having kindled the fire. He instead keeps on stoking it using his sharp skills and the constant drive to attain his…Ulterior Motive! Yes, just the way with Surpanakha, we can associate a Conspiracy theory with Shakuni too. Let us attempt to know more about this wise yet cunning brother of Gandhari - Mamashri.

This theory has close association with his favorite Dice, using which he crushes (defeat is too mild a word to express what he did) the Pandavas. The Dice were made up of his Father’s thigh bones (King Subala). The theory states that Shakuni did all that he did to cause the downfall of the Kaurava Race. To attain this, he thought of no method better than corrupting the young, impressionable minds of the 100 sons of King Dhrithrashtra. As to what he did is common knowledge. Wise as he was, Shakuni was firmly of the belief that the Kauravas would be of no match for the Pandavas and their righteous ways. As for the war, though he was one among the important counsels of Duryodhana, he was never in doubt of the Pandava victory especially with Lord Krishna on their side. So aware was he of the true form of the Lord that he had called Duryodhana a fool for preferring the Lord’s Mayavi Army over the Lord himself. But the question still remains; why had he done so?

There are two versions to this; one simple and straight forward and the other devious and maybe even difficult to digest. Whereas one relates to the Grand Sire of the Kuru race, Bheeshma the other relates to his own nephew, Duryodhana.
1. Shakuni took a simplistic vow to be the cause of the Kaurava’s downfall upon learning that the great Bheeshma had asked for the hand of Gandhari for his blind nephew Dhrithrashtra. He regarded this to be a matter of great insult and was further aghast by her sister’s decision to remain blind-folded herself.
2. Following the advice of astrologers, Gandhari was married to a goat (subsequently sacrificed) prior to her marriage to Dhrithrashtra to avoid a certain calamity (known to be practiced in case of Manglik brides). So, technically this made Dhrithrashtra her second husband. Duryodhana upon having learnt this was deeply enraged and wanted to extract revenge from his maternal relations. He promptly had King Subala and his relations imprisoned. So cruel was his treatment that the entire family was only provided with one fistful of rice daily. King Subala realizing the elaborate plan to starve them to death decreed that only his youngest son would eat the sparse food and take revenge from the entire Kuru race. This son happened to be Shakuni, who after his father’s death got dice made out of his father’s thigh bones which he used to his advantage during the Game of Dice against Yudhishthir. He moved to Hastinapur to stay with his sister and constantly fed Duryodhana’s mind with the foulest of the ideas to usurp the power, which was deemed to be Yudhishthir’s for taking, as he was the eldest of the Kuru princes. He finally succeeded in orchestrating the war between the just Pandavas and the vile Kauravas, especially with Lord Krishna supporting the former.

Certain other details about Shakuni are:
1. Shakuni had two sons, Ulook and Vrikaasur. Ulook is known to have been the messenger sent by the Kauravas before the war to the Pandavas carrying their response to the Pandava’s proposal of peace. Ulook was killed by Nakul on the 17th day of the battle.
2. Shakuni was killed by Sahadev in a melee sword combat on the 17th day of the battle
3. Was Shakuni really lame? Or was Gufi Paintal, the actor, lame? Certainly not the latter. Gufi Paintal was the Associate Director of the Mega series, Mahabharat. He recommended B R Chopra to have him act lame, as it would make the character appear more sinister. So, this doesn’t necessarily mean that Shakuni was lame. But in an earlier movie on Mahabharat, Shakuni was lame too. So, does this mean that Shakuni was lame as per legends? Or did the director ingenuously want the character lame? I wonder if we will ever know.

ABHIMANYU
This, I assure you, would be the last tale for today’s menu; and possibly the intriguing of the lot. Abhimanyu’s tale is that of valor and courage par excellence displayed at a tender age of sixteen. He was born to, what one might term, a high profile couple; Subhadra (Lord Krishna’s step sister) and the great archer Arjuna.
What we most commonly know about him is his tragic death at the hands of seven warriors from the Kaurava camp. It is also known that he partially knew the art of entering the famous Chakravyuha (Lotus formation) but was not aware of the art of exiting from it. Before we get down to more exciting part, let us collate a few more facts about Abhimanyu.
1. He spent his childhood in Dwaraka where he was trained by Pradumnya (Lord Krishna’s son). He was regarded an equal to his father in the art of war. Abhimanyu literally means ‘Excessive Anger’.
2. He was married to Uttara, daughter of King Virata of the Matsya Kingdom. This alliance was also meant to seal Virata’s allegiance towards the Pandavas.
3. He was equal to virtually all the warriors of his time including the great Bheeshma himself in a duel. Once inside the Chakravyuha, he was able to badly injure Karna and render Dusshasana unconscious. His victims included Lakshamana, Duryodhana’s son and several other Maharathis (whose name we happen to be woefully unaware of).
4. His death blow was a crushing mace attack by Dusshasana’s son. When rendered weapon-less, he requested Karna to give him a sword to fight with and as it was high noon, Karna had to oblige to his request. But shockingly he stuck the sword into Abhimanyu’s abdomen and asked him to take it out.
5. He gained the knowledge of entering the Chakravyuha when in his mother’s womb. However, half way through the description Arjuna realized that Subhadra was asleep and didn’t explain the method of egress from the formation. During his stay in Dwaraka, Abhimanyu wished to learn the remainder lesson from Lord Krishna. However the Lord didn’t do so and asked him to ask Arjuna when back from the exile. Abhimanyu could never have a dialogue with his father about this, which resulted in his undoing.

The reason for including Abhimanyu in this article is that there is a certain controversy and even a conspiracy chiefly associated with his death. But fret not; I will not out rightly brand him a conspirer with an ulterior motive as the driving force. His death, as was the case with most of the great warriors, was pre-destined. Meanwhile, does it make you wonder why Lord Krishna didn’t explain the method of egress from the Chakravyuha to Abhimanyu? Keep this in mind as we get to know the various reasons associated with Abhimanyu’s destiny.
1. Abhimanyu was Soma Dev’s (Moon) son incarnate, upon the request of the other devas. However, Soma Dev agreed for a separation of no more than 16 years.
2. Abhimanyu was Soma Dev incarnate. Soma Dev was cursed by Sage Garga for impenitence but subsequently was given a reprieve by the sage to spend a reduced time of 16 years in the human form.
3. Certain sects (Draupadi Cult) regard Abhimanyu to be a Rakshasa. Born in the human form, he had the potential to destroy mankind. As per one legend, Abhimanyu was born so in accordance to a curse he had received in the Treta Yuga, when he was the Gate Keeper of Lord Rama’s palace. He was cursed by Sage Durvasa, for not letting him enter Lord Rama’s court. Aware of this, Lord Krishna saw to it that Abhimanyu’s knowledge of the Chakravyuha remained incomplete.
Certain theories state of Abhimanyu being capable of killing Lord Krishna, earlier than destined. His death may have been the result of an elaborate plan.
4. It is generally accepted that Lord Krishna deliberately kept Abhimanyu unaware of the egress method from the Chakravyuha. Apart from the relatively obscure reasons mentioned above, there is one reason which sounds reasonable. Lord Krishna was certain that the Kauravas would break the battle rules to kill Abhimanyu (as he was undefeatable in duels). It is by referring to this incident that Lord Krishna was sufficiently able to provoke Arjuna to kill Karna (he otherwise wouldn’t have as Karna was disarmed). It is also said that, this precisely was the only unprovoked sin that Karna had committed, for which he deserved an ignominious end!
FIN...OR MAYBE NOT!
Interesting weren’t they; but unfortunately, a little lengthy. That you can attribute to my over-thought and complex writing method resulting into tedium in reading. So, I have decided to skip further few interesting stories such as that of Vali and Karna, for now. Anyway that apart, it only proves that many a times sufficient probing into such epic stories is required; not that it will reveal the absolute truth. Because, I feel that in Mythology, like a personal God one can also maintain a personal truth! The value of such a truth is little until it translates into better perception and cleaner action.

Now, where do we stand - a long way from the assorted beginning which we had some half a year ago? No way; we are still running in circles. Also I think assorted is the way it goes with Mythology. So, I think we will go through this ordeal once again; maybe one last time. But I swear to make it a lot more objective (even one liners!) and easier to read than its predecessors. Until then…Adios Amigos!

RAVANA – EPITOME OF VILLANY, SIMPLY VAIN OR…
Indian Mythology, how much ever objectively written in the form of tales and fascinating stories, always has something for the intellectual and the debating kind. Whether it is about the fairness of the treatment meted out to Karna or the unfairness of Rama’s act of killing Vali, these tales have given way to varied opinion and long drawn discussions and even arguments which can only be classified as never-ending!
But as some may say, it is only for the Good. For, had it not been for these apparent incongruencies, we may not have had an opportunity to debate about the complex dealings of life which were commonplace in the myth tales (and are maybe even today). One such chapter in the Indian Mythology which at least has me interested is about Ravana; the so-called ten headed villain of the epic tale, Ramayana. Don’t mistake the usage of the term ‘so-called’ as my attempt to opine on the contrary. I am quoting so because that is what the general perception has been and what is apparent on the surface. And maybe that is what is meant to be too. However, we will, in these discussions, refrain from referring to Ravana as the Villain; for that is something which may be concluded but certainly not assumed. So let us embark on a journey (in an attempt) to establish some details, beyond the regular grounds, about this erstwhile King of Lanka.

THE MIXED (UP) ANCESTRY
The first thing one must be clear about Ravana is that he was not exactly a Rakshasa. He was born to Vishrava, a Brahmin Sage and Kaikesi, a Daitya Princess. His paternal grandfather was the sage Pulastya and his great grandfather was none other than Lord Brahma himself. His parents’ alliance was brought about by his maternal grandfather, Sumali who wished to have an exceptional heir for his race. Ravana had six brothers and two sisters.

Ø Kubera (half brother), guardian of the heavenly wealth and Ravana’s predecessor as King of Lanka
Ø Vibhishana, devotee of Lord Rama and Ravana’s successor as King of Lanka.
Ø Kumbhakarna, victim of a boon turned curse by Brahma and less disillusioned than Ravana in matters of Dharma.
Ø Mahiravana, King of the Netherworld; famous from the episode of the Ayodhya princes’ rescue by Hanuman with the help of Goddess Kali.
Ø Surpanakha, christened as Meenakshi at birth (one with eyes like that of a fish); famous for provoking her brother to not only seek revenge for her humiliation but also capture Sita Devi for his own self.
Ø Kumbhini, wife of Demon Madhu (after whose name Mathura is christened) and mother of Lavanasura (killed by Shatrughna in his quest of Mathura); she and Surpanakha are known to have retired to the sea for penance after their brother’s demise
Ø Khara and Dushana, King and Viceroy of Janashtana (Kingdom bordering Kosala, Lord Rama’s Kingdom)

An oft debated issue about Ravana is his clan’s geographical origin. That he ruled in the southern part of the Indian subcontinent has led many to believe that he is a Dravidian; natives of the land prior to the arrival of the Aryans. Alternate theory suggests that his ancestors migrated to the southern lands from the western parts of India, had close connections with the Yadavas (that Ravana’s nephew ruled Mathura is used as powerful testimony to prove this point) and were actually Aryans by origin. It is thus debated that Lord Rama was not the first Aryan to venture south and that the Vanaras were symbolic of the Dravidians of the south. It is theorized that Lord Rama taught these natives to live by the Social codes than by the Jungle laws (Matsya Nyaya).

PIT STOP I
Allow me to diverge here a little to mention about certain interesting lineages. Sage Shukracharya, the one eyed preceptor of the Daityas had a daughter, Devyani. Though a Brahmin, through a twist of fate she happened to marry a Kshatriya Prince of the Bharata race, Yayati. Yayati also secretly married Devyani’s hand maid, Sharmishtha, the daughter of Vrishaparva, the King of the Daityas. Through the first union was born Yadu and through the latter was born Puru. Having earned a curse and a boon respectively, Yadu’s descendants, the Yadavas, were never to become the Kings of any land and Puru’s descedants, the Kauravas and the Pandavas among others, were to rule the earth till the horizon. It is interesting to note that the accursed, indulgent and careless (having caused their own demise) Yadavas partially had the Brahmin blood, whereas the noble, heroic and proud Pandavas had Daitya blood running in their veins. The ways of the world and beyond sure were complex as per these tales.

VITALSTATISTICS…OF DEEDS
More than anything else, Ravana is known for his Ten Heads; many depictions portray him so. Television and theatre version of the Ramayana describe Ravana to grow into the ten headed state especially when angered. It is said that in an attempt to invoke Lord Shiva, Ravana sacrificed his head. Each time he did so, the Lord reinstated him back to normalcy. However on the 10th such occasion, the Lord finally heeded to Ravana’s calls and blessed him with ten heads. A more philosophical version states that the ‘ten headed’ state of Ravana is symbolic of his thorough knowledge of the 4 Vedas and the 6 Upanishads making him as powerful as 10 scholars.
On this note, let us attempt to enlist the various firsts and greats attributed to Ravana:

Ø A half Brahmin-half Daitya that he was, Ravana was an exemplary scholar and a master of the arts and ways of Kshatriyas
Ø Ravana was an artist par excellence. He is attributed with the creation of the Kamboji Raga (Carnatic Music) and is said to be able to play the Veena with his veins for strings. His contest with Agastya to melt a mountain by playing Veena stands testimony to his skill. His flag is said to have had a picture of Veena on it. He is also said to be an extraordinary painter. This in conjunction with his deep insight in philosophy are said to have been common features in his courts and even beyond.
Ø He is said to have authored Ravana Sanhita – also known as Kali Kitab – a powerful book on Hindu Astrology. He possessed thorough knowledge of Ayurveda and Arthashastra.
Ø Upon his severe penance towards Brahma, Ravana, though denied the boon of immortality, was gifted with the celestial nectar of immortality, which he stored under his navel. After gaining powers and boons, Ravana assumed leadership of the Rakshasa Army and usurped Lanka, created by Vishwakarma (celestial architect) for Kubera. Ravana ruled Lanka the way neither anybody had nor did. It is said that even the poorest of the houses had gold vessels to eat from.
Ø By the time Lord Vishnu incarnated as Rama on Earth, Ravana was virtually the emperor of the three worlds, dominating all human and divine races; so much so that he could command the rising and setting of the Sun.
Ø He was one of the most earnest devotees of Lord Shiva. He is supposed to have composed the hymn dedicated to Lord Shiva, Shiva Tandava Stotra. Once Ravana, in vain, had attempted to lift the Mount Kailash; Lord Shiva upon realizing some disturbance, pinned the mountain with Ravana underneath it with his little toe finger. Ravana, who roared so loud that the mountains quaked, upon realizing whom he had offended, composed and sang songs of the Lord for years until he was released. Pleased, Lord Shiva presented Ravana the divine sword ‘Chandrahasa’. It is after this incident that Ravana was named so; Ravana literally means the one with a terrifying roar.
Ø Ravana sought the friendship of Vali, after having been subdued by him. Ravana had heard of Vali and had challenged him to a duel. Vali, who was meditating towards Lord Shiva then, asked Ravana to wait until he was done with the meditation. Though Ravana agreed to this, through trickery, tried to tie Vali up. Vali having sensed Ravana’s movements, bundled him in his tail, tucked him under his armpits and bathed in the three oceans and eventually returned to Kishkindha. Convinced of his opponent’s might, Ravana sang to Vali’s glory.

IT ALL HAPPENED BECAUSE…

It is often said that Mother Sita was Ravana’s nemesis; in the sense that Ravana’s ill behavior towards Sita resulted in his destruction. But maybe there was more towards it. Along his way to glory, Ravana managed to accumulate some curses which, as usually is the case, formed the basis of his eventual doom. And as it happens, they are related to women.
Ø First was the daughter of a sage - Vedavati. She was a devout follower of Lord Vishnu and was performing penances to win Lord Vishnu as her husband. One day as Ravana passed by the forest where Vedavati resided, he was smitten by her beauty, which was further enhanced by her austerities. Ravana, known for his aggressive conquests of women, molested Vedavati. Anguished by this, she jumped into a pyre, proclaiming that she, born as his own daughter, will be the reason for his death.
Ø Second though not a death curse, greatly limited Ravana’s potential to cause harm to Mother Sita. The divine Apsara, Rambha was the daughter-in-law of Kubera. Ravana forced himself upon Rambha, who pleaded him to spare her, as she, by extension, was like his daughter. She eventually cursed him to lose all his heads if he were ever to force himself upon a woman. It is this that caused Ravana to grant Mother Sita a maximum of one year to agree to his terms. As he could not force upon her, her consensus was a must. Alternate theory suggests that, it was Mother Sita who asked for this extension; she wanted to buy time within which she was sure that Lord Rama would rescue her.
Ø On this note, let us also remember who Ravana possibly was. One version, as we’ve discussed, speaks about the Door Keepers of Lord Vishnu being cursed by the Sanath Kumars (alternately by Sage Narada) to be born on earth (as enemies of the Lord) and that they would earn salvation only by death at hands of the lord. Ravana and Kumbhakarna were one such avatars of the door keepers.

THE CAPTOR AND THE CAPTIVE
One of the most pivotal points of Ramayana is the abduction of Mother Sita by Ravana and her struggle in his captivity. There are however other factors common to them; each more disbelieving than the other. But before this, a word about Ravana’s wife Mandodari is a must.

PIT STOP II
Mandodari was the daughter of the celestial architect Maya. Her beauty is held in parallel with that of Mother Sita herself. She is one among the Panch Kanyas alongside Ahalya, Draupadi, Kunti and Tara. Panch Kanyas are supposed to signify the five elements of nature and the utterance of their names can wash away all ones sins.

Ø Suitor – Ravana, a polygamist and lord of an incredibly sized harem, is said to have attended Sita’s Swayamvara. He attempted to lift the Rudra (Lord Shiva’s bow) but failed to do so.
Ø Mother (!) – Post a Yagya, Ravana was given celestial water, drinking which his wife Mandodari was to become pregnant. During their night stay at a forest, a thirsty Ravana was compelled to drink this water and was thus impregnated. He coughed ferociously and a child is said to have landed in Janakpura, the Kingdom of King Janaka. It is this child whom King Janaka finds in his fields during the ploughing-in ceremony after a Yagya to invoke rains in his drought hit kingdom. The lowest blade of the plough to have struck the vessel holding the child is called Seet; thus the name Seeta for the girl child.
Ø Father – After Ravana was cursed by Vedavati, Mandodari became extremely vary, as she has just become pregnant then. She feared that Vedavati’s curse may come true and wanted to keep this child as far away from Ravana as possible. Under the pretence of going to her parent’s place, Mandodari was able to keep this fact a secret from Ravana. Upon delivery, Mandodari abandoned the child in a field; only for the child to be later found by King Janaka in his kingdom. Wonder how Mandodari ended up placing the child near Janakpur (Supposedly in Central India)? Well because Maya ruled a place, which is in modern day Rajasthan!

THE SONS OF (MIS) FORTUNE
No mythological biography (well, this almost is one) can be complete without a mention about the descendants. It is interesting to note that Ravana outlived all his sons. Essentially in the war against Rama, all of Ravana’s sons died before he did.

Ø Indrajit / Meghanad – He is famously known for his attempted execution of Lakshmana and his Magical powers. Meghanad literally means the one with the voice of thunder. He gained the near immortality boon from Brahma when he agreed to free Indra, whom he had conquered during the Devasur Sangram (battle between the Devas and the Asuras) and was christened as Indrajit by Brahma. Lakshmana killed him after destroying his Yagya towards Goddess Nikumbila.
Ø Akshya Kumara – A warrior of mere sixteen, he was pitched in a battle against Hanuman and was eventually killed, when the latter was destroying the Ashok Vatika (After meeting Mother Sita and before burning Lanka with his tail-on-fire).
Ø Prahasta – Described as a ruthless warrior by Valmiki, Prahasta was killed by Lakshamana, when he had wreaked havoc in Sugreeva’s Army on the first day of the battle. He was the first Chief General of Ravana’s army.
Ø Atikaya – He was the son of Ravana and his second wife, Dhanyamalini. He is said to have held the Trishul in mid air, which was hurled by Lord Shiva towards him. A pleased Shiva blessed him with knowledge of Archery and Divine weapons. A bearer of the invincible armor gifted by Brahma, Atikaya was killed by Lakshmana by a Brahmastra (the only weapon to be able to pierce such a defense).
Ø Narantaka & Devantaka – Killed in their previous avatar (In Satya Yuga) by Lord Ganesha, these sons of Ravana were killed by Hanuman and Angada respectively in the battle.
Ø Trishira – He personally engaged Lord Rama in a battle only to be killed in the duel that ensued

CHEQUERED FLAG…OR MAYBE NOT
So, here we are, having discussed Ravana in some 2000 words. Certain information may have come as a surprise; and some even downright ridiculous. But we are not done yet. Don’t we usually leave the dessert for the end? So, I think it is high time I mentioned that Ravana is also…Worshipped. Well you may have heard of it. But in case you didn’t know the where and the who, here we go.

Ø Alvar, Rajasthan: Both Parsvanath and Ravana are worshipped in a Jain temple here. Ravana was a devotee of Parsvanath. This temple was built by Mandodari for Ravana.
Ø Mandor, Rajasthan: This place, very close to Jodhpur has a mandap where Ravana is supposed to have married Mandodari; known as Ravana ji ki Chanwari.
Ø Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh: A huge Shivalinga installed by Ravana and his own idol are worshipped by the locals
Ø Jodhpur, Rajasthan: Recently, a Ravana temple was erected here. Dave Brahmins of Jodhpur are said to have descended from Ravana’s clan are said to perform Shraddh (Death Anniversary) on every Dusshera.

These are to name a few. Quite surely, Sri Lanka would have a fair few temples dedicated to Ravana. But being a great Shiva devotee that he was, it is not so surprising that Ravana found a place in the Indian religious context. You may note that Ravana finds a place in Jainism too. In Jainism, one era is divided into 12 Aaras, 6 for glory and 6 for downfall of mankind. Every group of 6 Aaras has 24 Tirthankars. Parsvanath is the 23rd Tirthankar and Mahavira is the 24th in the current downfall phase. Ravana, along with Lord Rama, Lord Krishna and Mother Sita, is supposed to be one among the 24 Tirthankars in the next phase (of glory) of 6 Aaras.

PODIUM TIME…
Finally, we are near the conclusion; at least with regards this abridged biography. As for the other things about Ravana (such topics can never be exhaustive), especially his evil deeds, well those are common knowledge. His vanity, ego, ill treatment of women in general, path of Adharma etc. are just the various attributes which we can draw from a general read of the Ramayana.
Now with this, I think we can happily go about forming conclusive opinion about Ravana. But I leave the choice to you; Good, Bad or Ugly is not for me to tell surely!

P.S. – Behold! We’re not done yet with this story. Well, maybe for now, yes. But you may notice some emboldened text in the midst of many lines. These points deserved further mention and explanation. I will continue on these the next time. And of course once those are attended to, there will be lots more. After all, can we ever be done with Mythology?

VOTE OF THANKS
This time it was not only word of mouth but also several web pages and books which helped me compile all that we’ve read above. Find the sources enlisted below.
Ø Good Ol’ Wikipedia -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravana and more...
Ø SSCNET - http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/Religions/Avatars/Ravana.html
Ø Rediff, Yahoo and similar such sites
Ø Ramanaya by C. Rajagopala Chari
Ø Scores of Amar Chitra Katha books
Ø Dear Mataji for her discourses through years
Ø All those Aunts, Uncles and Friends who chipped in with little tales now and then
Ø All those un-named sources whom / which I can acknowledge but not enlist